ML4WX

Hybrid physics-ML & parameterization

Physically regularized machine learning emulators of aerosol activation

Sam James Silva, Po‐Lun Ma, Joseph Clinton Hardin, Daniel Rothenberg

Geoscientific model development · · Tomorrow.io

PaperPDF

In one sentence. Physically regularized ML emulators of aerosol activation outperform many existing parameterizations, enabling hybrid models for Earth system models.

Abstract

Abstract. The activation of aerosol into cloud droplets is an important step in the formation of clouds, and strongly influences the radiative budget of the Earth. Explicitly simulating aerosol activation in Earth system models is challenging due to the computational complexity required to resolve the necessary chemical and physical processes and their interactions. As such, various parameterizations have been developed to approximate these details at reduced computational cost and accuracy. Here, we explore how machine learning emulators can be used to bridge this gap in computational cost and parameterization accuracy. We evaluate a set of emulators of a detailed cloud parcel model using physically regularized machine learning regression techniques. We find that the emulators can reproduce the parcel model at higher accuracy than many existing parameterizations. Furthermore, physical regularization tends to improve emulator accuracy, most significantly when emulating very low activation fractions. This work demonstrates the value of physical constraints in machine learning model development and enables the implementation of improved hybrid physical-machine learning models of aerosol activation into next generation Earth system models.

Labels

Topic
Hybrid physics-ML & parameterization, Climate emulation
Type
New model or method
Method
Classical ML (trees, GP, linear, kernels), Physics-informed / physics-constrained
Domain
Global
Data
Other
Status
Research
Identifiers
DOI:10.5194/gmd-14-3067-2021 OpenAlex:W3125935968
Added
2026-10-22

Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.