ML4WX

Extremes & hazards

Quantifying Very Extreme Precipitation and Temperature Using Huge Ensembles Generated by Machine Learning–Based Climate Model Emulators

Christopher J. Paciorek, Daniel Cooley

Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · · Colorado State University (incl. CIRA), University of California, Berkeley

PaperPDF

In one sentence. A 10,560-year ACE2 ensemble shows that extreme value methods can estimate very rare precipitation and temperature quantiles over the contiguous US, including values beyond the training range.

Abstract

Abstract Weather extremes produce major impacts on society and ecosystems and are likely to change in likelihood and magnitude with climate change. However, very low-probability events are hard to characterize statistically using observations or even climate model output because of short records/runs. For precipitation, consideration of such events arises in quantifying probable maximum precipitation (PMP), namely, estimating extreme precipitation magnitudes for designing and assessing critical infrastructure. A recent National Academies report on modernizing PMP estimation proposed using very large climate model-based ensembles to estimate extreme quantiles, possibly through machine learning–based ensemble boosting. Here, we assess statistical aspects of such an approach for the contiguous United States using a huge ensemble (10 560 years) produced by a state-of-the-art emulator (ACE2) trained on ERA5 reanalysis. The results indicate that one can practically estimate very extreme precipitation and temperature quantiles, provided one uses appropriate statistical extreme value techniques. More specifically, the results provide evidence for 1) the use of threshold-exceedance methods with a sufficiently high threshold (necessary for precipitation) for reliable estimation, 2) the robustness of results to variation in extremes by season and storm type, and 3) the sufficiency of the ensemble for well-constrained statistical uncertainty. Our results also show that the emulator produces extremes outside the range of the ERA5 training data. While encouraging for emulators’ potential use for quantifying the climatology of extremes, more investigation is needed to assess whether emulators are fit for this purpose. Our focus is on how to use huge ensembles to estimate very extreme statistics; we expect the results to be relevant for future improved emulators. Significance Statement Weather extremes produce major impacts on society and ecosystems and are likely to change in likelihood and magnitude with climate change. Machine learning now provides methods to simulate weather for many hypothetical years at much lower computational expense than traditional models. This could provide the opportunity to estimate the magnitude of very low-probability events using statistical methods applied to the simulation output, for use in planning, risk assessment, and adaptation. Our work finds that when used appropriately, statistical methods designed to analyze extremes can reliably estimate the magnitude of extremely high precipitation and temperature events in the United States, under the critical assumption that the machine learning method is a good mimic of real-world weather.

Labels

Topic
Extremes & hazards, Climate emulation, Benchmarks, datasets & evaluation
Type
Evaluation or intercomparison of existing models
Method
Neural operator (FNO, SFNO, ...)
Time scale
Climate projections / centennial
Domain
Regional
Data
ERA5 / reanalysis
Status
Research
Identifiers
arXiv:2510.08893 DOI:10.1175/bams-d-25-0178.1 OpenAlex:W4417118523
Added
2026-10-22

Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.