The Need for Ethical, Responsible, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence for Environmental Sciences

Amy McGovern, Imme Ebert-Uphoff, David John Gagne, Ann Bostrom

arXiv preprint · 15 December 2021

In one sentence. Position paper arguing AI in environmental sciences risks bias and injustice, with weather and climate examples; calls for responsible AI practice.

Abstract

Given the growing use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods across all aspects of environmental sciences, it is imperative that we initiate a discussion about the ethical and responsible use of AI. In fact, much can be learned from other domains where AI was introduced, often with the best of intentions, yet often led to unintended societal consequences, such as hard coding racial bias in the criminal justice system or increasing economic inequality through the financial system. A common misconception is that the environmental sciences are immune to such unintended consequences when AI is being used, as most data come from observations, and AI algorithms are based on mathematical formulas, which are often seen as objective. In this article, we argue the opposite can be the case. Using specific examples, we demonstrate many ways in which the use of AI can introduce similar consequences in the environmental sciences. This article will stimulate discussion and research efforts in this direction. As a community, we should avoid repeating any foreseeable mistakes made in other domains through the introduction of AI. In fact, with proper precautions, AI can be a great tool to help {\it reduce} climate and environmental injustice. We primarily focus on weather and climate examples but the conclusions apply broadly across the environmental sciences.

Labels

Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.