ML4WX

Climate analysis & attribution

Evaluation of statistical climate reconstruction methods based on pseudoproxy experiments using linear and machine-learning methods

Zeguo Zhang, Sebastian Wagner, Marlene Klockmann, Eduardo Zorita

Climate of the past ·

PaperPDF

In one sentence. Pseudoproxy tests compare Bi-LSTM with linear PCR and CCA for millennial NH and NAE summer temperature reconstruction; Bi-LSTM is less skilful but captures extreme cooling.

Abstract

Abstract. Three different climate field reconstruction (CFR) methods employed to reconstruct North Atlantic-European (NAE) and Northern Hemisphere (NH) summer season temperature over the past millennium from proxy records are tested in the framework of pseudoproxy experiments derived from three climate simulations with Earth System Models. Two of these methods are traditional multivariate linear methods (Principal Components Regression, PCR and Canonical Correlation Analysis, CCA), whereas the third method (Bidirectional Long-Short-Term Memory Neural Network, Bi-LSTM) belongs to the category of machine learning methods. The Bi-LSTM method does not need to assume linear and temporally stable relationships between the underlying proxy network and the targeted climate field, in contrast to PCR and CCA. In addition, Bi-LSTM incorporates information on the serial correlation of the time series. All three methods tested herein achieve reasonable reconstruction performance in both spatial and temporal scale. Generally, the reconstruction skill is higher in regions with denser proxy coverage, but reconstruction skill is also achieved in proxy-free areas due to climate teleconnections. All three CFR methodologies generally tend to more strongly underestimate the target temperature variations as more noise is introduced into the pseudoproxies. The Bi-LSTM method tested in our experiments shows relatively worse reconstruction skills compared to PCR and CCA, yet it brings some encouraging results on capturing extreme cooling climate signals. This indicates that this nonlinear CFR method could be a potential methodology for past climate extremes analysis.

Labels

Topic
Climate analysis & attribution, Benchmarks, datasets & evaluation
Type
Evaluation or intercomparison of existing models
Method
RNN / LSTM / ConvLSTM
Domain
Regional
Data
CMIP / climate model output, Other
Status
Research
Identifiers
DOI:10.5194/cp-18-2643-2022 OpenAlex:W4313447233
Added
2026-10-22

Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.