ML4WX

Climate analysis & attribution

Observational benchmarks inform representation of soil organic carbon dynamics in land surface models

Kamal Nyaupane, Umakant Mishra, Feng Tao, Kyongmin Yeo, W. J. Riley, Forrest M. Hoffman, Sagar Gautam

Biogeosciences · · IBM Research, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory / NERSC, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tsinghua University (NowcastNet)

Paper

In one sentence. Random forest and GAM on 54,000 soil carbon observations reveal controls that differ from CMIP6 Earth system models, guiding carbon-feedback representation.

Abstract

Abstract. Representing soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics in Earth system models (ESMs) is a key source of uncertainty in predicting carbon climate feedbacks. Machine learning models can help identify dominant environmental controllers and their functional relationships with SOC stocks. The resulting knowledge can be implemented in ESMs to reduce uncertainty and better predict SOC dynamics over space and time. In this study, we used a large number of SOC field observations (n = 54,000), geospatial datasets of environmental factors (n = 46), and two machine learning approaches (Random Forest (RF) and Generalized Additive Modeling (GAM)) to: (1) identify dominant environmental controllers of global and biome-specific SOC stocks, (2) derive functional relationships between environmental controllers and SOC stocks, and (3) compare the identified environmental controllers and predictive relationships with those in Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase six (CMIP6) models. Our results showed that diurnal temperature, drought index, cation exchange capacity, and precipitation were important observed environmental controllers of SOC stocks. RF model predictions of global-scale SOC stocks were relatively accurate (R2 = 0.61, RMSE = 0.46 kg m−2). In contrast, precipitation, temperature, and net primary productivity explained > 96 % of ESM-modeled SOC stock variability. We also found very different functional relationships between environmental factors and SOC stocks in observations and ESMs. SOC predictions in ESMs may be improved significantly by including additional environmental controls (e.g., cation exchange capacity) and representing the functional relationships of environmental controllers consistent with observations.

Labels

Topic
Climate analysis & attribution
Type
Evaluation or intercomparison of existing models
Method
Classical ML (trees, GP, linear, kernels)
Time scale
Climate projections / centennial
Domain
Global
Data
CMIP / climate model output, Other
Status
Research
Identifiers
DOI:10.5194/bg-21-5173-2024 OpenAlex:W4404520275
Added
2026-10-22

Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.