ML4WX

Observations & remote sensing

Tropical cyclone size estimation based on deep learning using infrared and microwave satellite data

Jianbo Xu, Xiang Wang, Haiqi Wang, Haiqi Wang, Chengwu Zhao, Huizan Wang, Huizan Wang, Junxing Zhu

Frontiers in Marine Science ·

PaperPDF

In one sentence. TC-Resnet estimates tropical cyclone 34-kt wind radii from infrared and microwave satellite data with MAE of 11.3 nmi and r of 0.907.

Abstract

Tropical cyclone (TC) size is an important parameter for estimating TC risks such as wind damage, rainfall distribution, and storm surge. Satellite observation data are the primary data used to estimate TC size. Traditional methods of TC size estimation rely on a priori knowledge of the meteorological domain and emerging deep learning-based methods do not consider the considerable blurring and background noise in TC cloud systems and the application of multisource observation data. In this paper, we propose TC-Resnet, a deep learning-based model that estimates 34-kt wind radii (R34, commonly used as a measure of TC size) objectively by combining infrared and microwave satellite data. We regarded the resnet-50 model as the basic framework and embedded a convolution layer with a 5 × 5 convolution kernel on the shortcut branch in its residual block for downsampling to avoid the information loss problem of the original model. We also introduced a combined channel-spatial dual attention mechanism to suppress the background noise of TC cloud systems. In an R34 estimation experiment based on a global TC dataset containing 2003–2017 data, TC-Resnet outperformed existing methods of TC size estimation, obtaining a mean absolute error of 11.287 nmi and a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.907.

Labels

Topic
Observations & remote sensing, Extremes & hazards
Type
New model or method
Method
CNN / U-Net
Domain
Global
Data
Satellite
Status
Research
Identifiers
DOI:10.3389/fmars.2022.1077901 OpenAlex:W4318828913
Added
2026-10-22

Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.