ML4WX

Extremes & hazards

Status and prospects for drought forecasting: opportunities in artificial intelligence and hybrid physical–statistical forecasting

Amir AghaKouchak, Baoxiang Pan, Omid Mazdiyasni, Mojtaba Sadegh, Shakil Jiwa, Wenkai Zhang, Charlotte A. Love, Shahrbanou Madadgar, Simon Michael Papalexiou, Steven J. Davis, Kuolin Hsu, Soroosh Sorooshian

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences ·

PaperPDF

In one sentence. Review argues for bottom-up AI and hybrid physical-statistical drought forecasting, prioritising robustness and uncertainty stability over event-based verification.

Abstract

Despite major improvements in weather and climate modelling and substantial increases in remotely sensed observations, drought prediction remains a major challenge. After a review of the existing methods, we discuss major research gaps and opportunities to improve drought prediction. We argue that current approaches are top-down, assuming that the process(es) and/or driver(s) are known—i.e. starting with a model and then imposing it on the observed events (reality). With the help of an experiment, we show that there are opportunities to develop bottom-up drought prediction models—i.e. starting from the reality (here, observed events) and searching for model(s) and driver(s) that work. Recent advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning provide significant opportunities for developing bottom-up drought forecasting models. Regardless of the type of drought forecasting model (e.g. machine learning, dynamical simulations, analogue based), we need to shift our attention to robustness of theories and outputs rather than event-based verification. A shift in our focus towards quantifying the stability of uncertainty in drought prediction models, rather than the goodness of fit or reproducing the past, could be the first step towards this goal. Finally, we highlight the advantages of hybrid dynamical and statistical models for improving current drought prediction models. This article is part of the Royal Society Science+ meeting issue ‘Drought risk in the Anthropocene’.

Labels

Topic
Extremes & hazards, Sub-seasonal to seasonal
Type
Review, survey or tutorial
Method
Classical ML (trees, GP, linear, kernels), Other
Time scale
2 weeks–2 months, Seasonal to annual
Domain
Global
Data
Other
Status
Research
Identifiers
DOI:10.1098/rsta.2021.0288 OpenAlex:W4307111613
Added
2026-10-22

Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.