ML4WX

Hybrid physics-ML & parameterization

Correcting Systematic and State‐Dependent Errors in the NOAA FV3‐GFS Using Neural Networks

Tse‐Chun Chen, Stephen Gregory Penny, Jeffrey S. Whitaker, Sergey Frolov, Robert L. Pincus, Stefan N. Tulich

Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · · NOAA (incl. GFDL, PSL, GSL, NCEP/EMC), Columbia University (LEAP, Lamont-Doherty)

PaperPDF

In one sentence. Neural networks learn FV3-GFS systematic error from data assimilation analysis increments and apply online corrections, improving 10-day forecast skill at all lead times.

Abstract

Abstract Weather forecasts made with imperfect models contain state‐dependent errors. Data assimilation (DA) partially corrects these errors with new information from observations. As such, the corrections, or “analysis increments,” produced by the DA process embed information about model errors. An attempt is made here to extract that information to improve numerical weather prediction. Neural networks (NNs) are trained to predict corrections to the systematic error in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's FV3‐GFS model based on a large set of analysis increments. A simple NN focusing on an atmospheric column significantly improves the estimated model error correction relative to a linear baseline. Leveraging large‐scale horizontal flow conditions using a convolutional NN, when compared to the simple column‐oriented NN, does not improve skill in correcting model error. The sensitivity of model error correction to forecast inputs is highly localized by vertical level and by meteorological variable, and the error characteristics vary across vertical levels. Once trained, the NNs are used to apply an online correction to the forecast during model integration. Improvements are evaluated both within a cycled DA system and across a collection of 10‐day forecasts. It is found that applying state‐dependent NN‐predicted corrections to the model forecast improves the overall quality of DA and improves the 10‐day forecast skill at all lead times.

Labels

Topic
Hybrid physics-ML & parameterization, Data assimilation
Type
New model or method
Method
CNN / U-Net
Time scale
3–15 days
Domain
Global
Data
NWP analysis or forecasts (IFS, GFS, ...)
Status
Research
Identifiers
DOI:10.1029/2022ms003309 OpenAlex:W4306720403
Added
2026-10-22

Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.