ML4WX

Data assimilation

Non‐Gaussian Detection Using Machine Learning With Data Assimilation Applications

Michael Goodliff, Steven J. Fletcher, Anton J. Kliewer, Andrew S. Jones, John M. Forsythe

Earth and Space Science · · NOAA (incl. GFDL, PSL, GSL, NCEP/EMC), Colorado State University (incl. CIRA)

Paper

In one sentence. SVM detects shifts in the Lorenz-63 variable distribution to switch between Gaussian and mixed Gaussian-lognormal 3DVar, reducing analysis error.

Abstract

Abstract In most data assimilation and numerical weather prediction systems, the Gaussian assumption is prevalent for the behavior of the random variables/errors that are involved. At the Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere theory has been developed for different forms of variational data assimilation schemes that enables the Gaussian assumption to be relaxed. For certain variable types, a lognormally distributed random variable can be combined in a mixed Gaussian‐lognormal distribution to better capture the interactions of the errors of different distributions. However, assuming that a distribution can change in time, then developing techniques to know when to switch between different versions of the data assimilation schemes becomes very important. By dynamically changing the formulation of the data assimilation system we are able to assimilate observations in a way that reflects the flow‐dependent variability of their distribution. In this paper, we present results with a machine learning technique (the support vector machine) to switch between data assimilation methods based on the detection of a change in the Lorenz 1963 model's z component's probability distribution. Given the machine learning technique's detection/prediction of a change in the distribution, then either a Gaussian or a mixed Gaussian‐lognormal 3DVar based cost function is used to minimize the errors in this period of time. It is shown that switching from a Gaussian 3DVar to a lognormal 3DVar at lognormally distributed parts of the attractor improves the data assimilation analysis error compared to using one distribution type for the entire attractor.

Labels

Topic
Data assimilation
Type
New model or method
Method
Classical ML (trees, GP, linear, kernels)
Data
Other
Status
Research
Identifiers
DOI:10.1029/2021ea001908 OpenAlex:W3114575811
Added
2026-10-22

Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.