Can Machines Learn to Predict Weather? Using Deep Learning to Predict Gridded 500‐hPa Geopotential Height From Historical Weather Data

Jonathan A. Weyn, Dale R. Durran, Rich Caruana

Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · 17 August 2019 · Microsoft Research (AI for Science), University of Washington

Paper

In one sentence. CNNs forecast 500-hPa geopotential height up to 14 days, beating persistence and barotropic vorticity model but not the operational NWP model.

Abstract

Abstract We develop elementary weather prediction models using deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) trained on past weather data to forecast one or two fundamental meteorological fields on a Northern Hemisphere grid with no explicit knowledge about physical processes. At forecast lead times up to 3 days, CNNs trained to predict only 500‐hPa geopotential height easily outperform persistence, climatology, and the dynamics‐based barotropic vorticity model, but do not beat an operational full‐physics weather prediction model. These CNNs are capable of forecasting significant changes in the intensity of weather systems, which is notable because this is beyond the capability of the fundamental dynamical equation that relies solely on 500‐hPa data, the barotropic vorticity equation. Modest improvements to the CNN forecasts can be made by adding 700‐ to 300‐hPa thickness to the input data. Our best performing CNN does a good job of capturing the climatology and annual variability of 500‐hPa heights and is capable of forecasting realistic atmospheric states at lead times of 14 days. Although our simple models do not perform better than an operational weather model, machine learning warrants further exploration as a weather forecasting tool; in particular, the potential efficiency of CNNs might make them attractive for ensemble forecasting.

Labels

Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.