ML4WX

Post-processing & calibration

Deep learning for downward longwave radiative flux forecasts in the Arctic

Dae-Hui Kim, Hyun Mee Kim

Expert Systems with Applications ·

Paper

In one sentence. CNN bias correction of ERA5 and PWRF downward longwave radiation in the Arctic reduces RMSE by 13–18% on independent 2020 data.

Abstract

Downward longwave radiative flux (LWD), a key factor affecting sea ice properties and warming (i.e., Arctic amplification) in the Arctic, has large uncertainties in numerical weather prediction (NWP) model simulations over the Arctic. LWD estimated in the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF)’s fifth-generation reanalysis (ERA5) underestimated the LWD observations at Hopen in Svalbard, Norway. Although LWD underestimation in the ERA5 reanalysis with respect to observations was improved in 24 h forecasts using the Polar Weather Research and Forecasting model (PWRF) without and with data assimilation (DA), 24 h LWD forecasts using PWRF continue to underestimate LWD observations. To improve LWD estimation in the Arctic, a deep learning post-processing model that corrects the bias of the LWD simulation was developed using convolutional neural network and ERA5 reanalysis (2016–2019) as training data. By applying the trained deep learning post-processing model to LWD from three independent datasets (i.e., ERA5 reanalysis data in 2020, 24 h forecasts in 2020 using PWRF without and with DA), the time-averaged root mean square errors (RMSEs) of LWD after deep learning post-processing were reduced by 17.62%, 14.98%, and 13.14%, respectively. Therefore, deep learning reduces uncertainties in LWD simulations in the Arctic. The deep learning model trained with ERA5 reanalysis (2016–2019) was able to correct the bias in LWD simulation from the same type of independent data (i.e., ERA5 reanalysis), as well as from different model type (i.e., PWRF forecasts without and with DA). Therefore, when several NWP models simulate the same atmospheric phenomena, a deep learning model trained with data from one NWP model can be applied to data from other NWP models to reduce uncertainties. Additionally, deep learning can further improve forecasts with DA. Therefore, it is expected that the cost required to generate training data will be reduced, and the efficiency of the deep learning model will increase.

Labels

Topic
Post-processing & calibration
Type
Application study
Method
CNN / U-Net
Time scale
6 h–3 days
Domain
Local / station
Data
ERA5 / reanalysis, NWP analysis or forecasts (IFS, GFS, ...), Station / in-situ
Status
Research
Identifiers
DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118547 OpenAlex:W4292133429
Added
2026-10-22

Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.