ML4WX

Observations & remote sensing

A Volume-to-Point Approach of QPE with Radar Data

Ting‐Shuo Yo, Shih‐Hao Su, Jung‐Lien Chu, Chiao‐Wei Chang, Hung‐Chi Kuo

Preprint ·

Paper

In one sentence. Machine learning maps gridded radar reflectivity volumes to hourly station precipitation in Taiwan, outperforming the operational QPE scheme for heavy rain.

Abstract

In this study, we proposed a volume-to-point framework for quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) based on the QPESUMS (Quantitative Precipitation Estimation and Segregation Using Multiple Sensor) Mosaic Radar dataset. With a data volume consisting of the time series of gridded radar reflectivities over the Taiwan area, we used machine learning algorithms to establish a statistical model for QPE in weather stations. The model extracts spatial and temporal features from the input data volume and then associates these features with the location-specific precipitations. In contrast to QPE methods based on the Z-R relation, we leverage the machine learning algorithms to automatically detect the evolution and movement of weather systems and associate these patterns to a location with specific topographic attributes. Specifically, we evaluated this framework with the hourly precipitation data of 45 weather stations in Taipei during 2013 ~ 2016. In comparison to the operational QPE scheme used by the Central Weather Bureau (CWB), the volume-to-point framework performed comparably well in general cases and excelled in detecting heavy-rainfall events. By using the current results as the reference benchmark, the proposed method can integrate the heterogeneous data sources and potentially improve the QPF in extreme precipitation scenarios.

Labels

Topic
Observations & remote sensing
Type
New model or method
Method
Classical ML (trees, GP, linear, kernels)
Domain
Local / station
Data
Radar, Station / in-situ
Status
Research
Identifiers
DOI:10.1002/essoar.10503594.1 OpenAlex:W4205221277
Added
2026-10-22

Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.