Explainability, uncertainty & physics
Defining error accumulation in ML atmospheric simulators
In one sentence. A definition and metric separate fixable model error from unfixable chaos in autoregressive ML weather models, and a regularization penalty improves RMSE and spread-skill.
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) has recently shown significant promise in modelling atmospheric systems, such as the weather. Many of these ML models are autoregressive, and error accumulation in their forecasts is a key problem. However, there is no clear definition of what `error accumulation' actually entails. In this paper, we propose a definition and an associated metric to measure it. Our definition distinguishes between errors which are due to model deficiencies, which we may hope to fix, and those due to the intrinsic properties of atmospheric systems (chaos, unobserved variables), which are not fixable. We illustrate the usefulness of this definition by proposing a simple regularization loss penalty inspired by it. This approach shows performance improvements (according to RMSE and spread/skill) in a selection of atmospheric systems, including the real-world weather prediction task.
Labels
- Topic
- Explainability, uncertainty & physics, Global medium-range NWP
- Type
- New model or method
- Method
- Other
- Time scale
- 3–15 days
- Domain
- Global
- Data
- ERA5 / reanalysis
- Status
- Research
- Identifiers
- arXiv:2405.14714 OpenAlex:W4398856201
- Added
- 2026-10-22
Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.