Improving probabilistic wind speed forecasting using M-Rice distribution and spatial data integration
In one sentence. A neural network predicts parametric wind speed distributions, with the M-Rice distribution outperforming alternatives and ERA5 neighbour data improving 6-hour station forecasts.
Abstract
We consider the problem of short-term forecasting of surface wind speed probability distribution. Our approach consists in predicting the parameters of a given probability density function by training a neural network model whose loss function is the corresponding log-likelihood. We compare different possibilities among a set of distributions that have been previously considered in the context of modeling wind fluctuations. Our results rely on two wind datasets recorded respectively by Météo-France in Corsica (South France) and by KNMI over the Netherlands. A first part of our work globally unveils the superiority of the so-called "Multifractal Rice" (M-Rice) distribution over alternative parametric models, showcasing its potential as a reliable tool for wind speed forecasting. This family ofdistributions relies on a random cascade model model for wind speeds along the same picture as fully developed turbulence. For all stations in both regions, it consistently provides better results regardless of the considered scoring rule or forecasting horizon. Our second findings demonstrate significant enhancements in forecasting accuracy when one incorporates wind speed data from proximate weather stations, in full agreement with former results for point-wise wind speed prediction. Moreover, we reveal that the incorporation of ERA5 reanalysis of 10 m wind data from neighboring grid points contributes to a substantial improvement mostly at longest time horizons ($h=6$ h). It turns out that accounting for pertinent explanatory factors, notably those related the spatial distribution and wind speed and direction, emerges as a more critical factor in enhancing accuracy than the choice of the "optimal" parametric distribution. We also find out that such explanatory factors mainly increases the resolution performances while it does not change the reliability contribution to the CRPS score.
Labels
- Topic
- Local & station forecasting, Post-processing & calibration
- Type
- New model or method
- Method
- Classical ML (trees, GP, linear, kernels)
- Time scale
- 6 h–3 days
- Domain
- Local / station
- Data
- Station / in-situ, ERA5 / reanalysis
- Status
- Research
- Identifiers
- arXiv:2310.12088 DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122840 OpenAlex:W4387837770
- Added
- 2026-10-22
Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.