Assessing Large Language Models on Climate Information
In one sentence. Framework and AI-assisted rating protocol show LLM climate answers have a significant gap between surface presentation and epistemological quality.
Abstract
As Large Language Models (LLMs) rise in popularity, it is necessary to assess their capability in critically relevant domains. We present a comprehensive evaluation framework, grounded in science communication research, to assess LLM responses to questions about climate change. Our framework emphasizes both presentational and epistemological adequacy, offering a fine-grained analysis of LLM generations spanning 8 dimensions and 30 issues. Our evaluation task is a real-world example of a growing number of challenging problems where AI can complement and lift human performance. We introduce a novel protocol for scalable oversight that relies on AI Assistance and raters with relevant education. We evaluate several recent LLMs on a set of diverse climate questions. Our results point to a significant gap between surface and epistemological qualities of LLMs in the realm of climate communication.
Labels
- Topic
- LLMs & agents
- Type
- Evaluation or intercomparison of existing models
- Method
- Language model
- Domain
- Global
- Data
- Other
- Status
- Research
- Identifiers
- arXiv:2310.02932
- Added
- 2026-10-22
Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.