ML4WX

Post-processing & calibration

Intelligent model for offshore China sea fog forecasting

Yanfei Xiang, Qinghong Zhang, Mingqing Wang, Ruixue Xia, Yang Kong, Xiaomeng Huang

arXiv preprint · · Tsinghua University (NowcastNet)

PaperPDF

In one sentence. Ensemble learning with focal loss improves 60-hour sea fog forecasts over WRF and NOAA FSL baselines off the Yangtze estuary, raising detection and cutting false alarms.

Abstract

Accurate and timely prediction of sea fog is very important for effectively managing maritime and coastal economic activities. Given the intricate nature and inherent variability of sea fog, traditional numerical and statistical forecasting methods are often proven inadequate. This study aims to develop an advanced sea fog forecasting method embedded in a numerical weather prediction model using the Yangtze River Estuary (YRE) coastal area as a case study. Prior to training our machine learning model, we employ a time-lagged correlation analysis technique to identify key predictors and decipher the underlying mechanisms driving sea fog occurrence. In addition, we implement ensemble learning and a focal loss function to address the issue of imbalanced data, thereby enhancing the predictive ability of our model. To verify the accuracy of our method, we evaluate its performance using a comprehensive dataset spanning one year, which encompasses both weather station observations and historical forecasts. Remarkably, our machine learning-based approach surpasses the predictive performance of two conventional methods, the weather research and forecasting nonhydrostatic mesoscale model (WRF-NMM) and the algorithm developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Forecast Systems Laboratory (FSL). Specifically, in regard to predicting sea fog with a visibility of less than or equal to 1 km with a lead time of 60 hours, our methodology achieves superior results by increasing the probability of detection (POD) while simultaneously reducing the false alarm ratio (FAR).

Labels

Topic
Post-processing & calibration, Local & station forecasting
Type
New model or method
Method
Classical ML (trees, GP, linear, kernels)
Time scale
6 h–3 days
Domain
Local / station
Data
Station / in-situ, NWP analysis or forecasts (IFS, GFS, ...)
Status
Research
Identifiers
arXiv:2307.10580 OpenAlex:W4385001472
Added
2026-10-22

Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.