ML4WX

Post-processing & calibration

A Spatiotemporal-Aware Climate Model Ensembling Method for Improving Precipitation Predictability

Ming Fan, Dan Lu, Deeksha Rastogi, Eric M. Pierce

arXiv preprint · · Oak Ridge National Laboratory

PaperPDF

In one sentence. Bayesian neural network weights CMIP6 models per location and season, improving monthly US precipitation predictions over simple ensemble baselines with interpretable weights.

Abstract

Multimodel ensembling has been widely used to improve climate model predictions, and the improvement strongly depends on the ensembling scheme. In this work, we propose a Bayesian neural network (BNN) ensembling method, which combines climate models within a Bayesian model averaging framework, to improve the predictive capability of model ensembles. Our proposed BNN approach calculates spatiotemporally varying model weights and biases by leveraging individual models' simulation skill, calibrates the ensemble prediction against observations by considering observation data uncertainty, and quantifies epistemic uncertainty when extrapolating to new conditions. More importantly, the BNN method provides interpretability about which climate model contributes more to the ensemble prediction at which locations and times. Thus, beyond its predictive capability, the method also brings insights and understanding of the models to guide further model and data development. In this study, we apply the BNN weighting scheme to an ensemble of CMIP6 climate models for monthly precipitation prediction over the conterminous United States. In both synthetic and real case studies, we demonstrate that BNN produces predictions of monthly precipitation with higher accuracy than three baseline ensembling methods. BNN can correctly assign a larger weight to the regions and seasons where the individual model fits the observation better. Moreover, its offered interpretability is consistent with our understanding of localized climate model performance. Additionally, BNN shows an increasing uncertainty when the prediction is farther away from the period with constrained data, which appropriately reflects our predictive confidence and trustworthiness of the models in the changing climate.

Labels

Topic
Post-processing & calibration, Climate analysis & attribution
Type
New model or method
Method
Other
Time scale
Climate projections / centennial
Domain
Regional
Data
CMIP / climate model output, Station / in-situ
Status
Research
Identifiers
arXiv:2208.04390 DOI:10.1002/essoar.10512289.1 OpenAlex:W4294653706
Added
2026-10-22

Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.