Extremes & hazards★ Highlight
A new paradigm for medium-range severe weather forecasts: probabilistic random forest-based predictions
Why it matters. Random forest day 4-8 severe weather forecasts from GEFS reforecasts, tested in real time against SPC outlooks; operationally relevant.
In one sentence. Random forests trained on GEFS reforecasts and severe weather reports give probabilistic US severe-weather forecasts for days 4-8, comparable to SPC outlooks at days 4-5.
Abstract
Historical observations of severe weather and simulated severe weather environments (i.e., features) from the Global Ensemble Forecast System v12 (GEFSv12) Reforecast Dataset (GEFS/R) are used in conjunction to train and test random forest (RF) machine learning (ML) models to probabilistically forecast severe weather out to days 4--8. RFs are trained with 9 years of the GEFS/R and severe weather reports to establish statistical relationships. Feature engineering is briefly explored to examine alternative methods for gathering features around observed events, including simplifying features using spatial averaging and increasing the GEFS/R ensemble size with time-lagging. Validated RF models are tested with ~1.5 years of real-time forecast output from the operational GEFSv12 ensemble and are evaluated alongside expert human-generated outlooks from the Storm Prediction Center (SPC). Both RF-based forecasts and SPC outlooks are skillful with respect to climatology at days 4 and 5 with degrading skill thereafter. The RF-based forecasts exhibit tendencies to underforecast severe weather events, but they tend to be well-calibrated at lower probability thresholds. Spatially averaging predictors during RF training allows for prior-day thermodynamic and kinematic environments to generate skillful forecasts, while time-lagging acts to expand the forecast areas, increasing resolution but decreasing objective skill. The results highlight the utility of ML-generated products to aid SPC forecast operations into the medium range.
Labels
- Topic
- Extremes & hazards, Post-processing & calibration
- Type
- New model or method
- Method
- Classical ML (trees, GP, linear, kernels)
- Time scale
- 3–15 days
- Domain
- Regional
- Data
- NWP analysis or forecasts (IFS, GFS, ...), Station / in-situ
- Status
- Pre-operational / experimental
- Identifiers
- arXiv:2208.02383 DOI:10.1175/waf-d-22-0143.1 OpenAlex:W4310576926
- Added
- 2026-10-22
Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.