ML4WX

Explainability, uncertainty & physics

Supervised machine learning to estimate instabilities in chaotic systems: estimation of local Lyapunov exponents

Daniel Ayers, Jack Lau, Javier Amezcua, Alberto Carrassi, Varun Ojha

Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · · University of Reading

PaperPDF

In one sentence. Regression trees, MLPs, CNNs and LSTMs estimate local Lyapunov exponents from trajectories of Lorenz-63 and Rössler systems, a feasibility study motivated by weather predictability.

Abstract

In chaotic dynamical systems such as the weather, prediction errors grow faster in some situations than in others. Real-time knowledge about the error growth could enable strategies to adjust the modelling and forecasting infrastructure on-the-fly to increase accuracy or reduce computation time. One could, e.g., change the ensemble size, or the distribution and type of target observations. Local Lyapunov exponents are known indicators of the rate at which very small prediction errors grow over a finite time interval. However, their computation is very expensive: it requires maintaining and evolving a tangent linear model, orthogonalisation algorithms and storing large matrices. In this feasibility study, we investigate the accuracy of supervised machine learning in estimating the current local Lyapunov exponents, from input of current and recent time steps of the system trajectory, as an alternative to the classical method. Thus machine learning is not used here to emulate a physical model or some of its components, but non intrusively as a complementary tool. We test four popular supervised learning algorithms: regression trees, multilayer perceptrons, convolutional neural networks and long short-term memory networks. Experiments are conducted on two low-dimensional chaotic systems of ordinary differential equations, the Rössler and the Lorenz 63 models. We find that on average the machine learning algorithms predict the stable local Lyapunov exponent accurately, the unstable exponent reasonably accurately, and the neutral exponent only somewhat accurately. We show that greater prediction accuracy is associated with local homogeneity of the local Lyapunov exponents on the system attractor. Importantly, the situations in which (forecast) errors grow fastest are not necessarily the same as those where it is more difficult to predict local Lyapunov exponents with machine learning.

Labels

Topic
Explainability, uncertainty & physics, Data assimilation
Type
New model or method
Method
Classical ML (trees, GP, linear, kernels)
Time scale
6 h–3 days
Domain
Global
Data
Other
Status
Research
Identifiers
arXiv:2202.04944 DOI:10.1002/qj.4450 OpenAlex:W4360946310
Added
2026-10-22

Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.