ML4WX

Local & station forecasting

Dynamical prediction of two meteorological factors using the deep neural network and the long short term memory $(1)$

Ki Hong Shin, Jae Won Jung, Sung Kyu Seo, Cheol Hwan You, Dong In Lee, Jisun Lee, Ki Ho Chang, Woon Seon Jung, Kyungsik Kim

arXiv preprint ·

PaperPDF

In one sentence. Compares ANN, DNN, ELM, LSTM and LSTM with peephole connections for temperature and humidity at ten South Korean cities; LSTM gives the lowest errors.

Abstract

It is important to calculate and analyze temperature and humidity prediction accuracies among quantitative meteorological forecasting. This study manipulates the extant neural network methods to foster the predictive accuracy. To achieve such tasks, we analyze and explore the predictive accuracy and performance in the neural networks using two combined meteorological factors (temperature and humidity). Simulated studies are performed by applying the artificial neural network (ANN), deep neural network (DNN), extreme learning machine (ELM), long short-term memory (LSTM), and long short-term memory with peephole connections (LSTM-PC) machine learning methods, and the accurate prediction value are compared to that obtained from each other methods. Data are extracted from low frequency time-series of ten metropolitan cities of South Korea from March 2014 to February 2020 to validate our observations. To test the robustness of methods, the error of LSTM is found to outperform that of the other four methods in predictive accuracy. Particularly, as testing results, the temperature prediction of LSTM in summer in Tongyeong has a root mean squared error (RMSE) value of 0.866 lower than that of other neural network methods, while the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) value of LSTM for humidity prediction is 5.525 in summer in Mokpo, significantly better than other metropolitan cities.

Labels

Topic
Local & station forecasting
Type
Evaluation or intercomparison of existing models
Method
RNN / LSTM / ConvLSTM, Classical ML (trees, GP, linear, kernels)
Time scale
6 h–3 days
Domain
Local / station
Data
Station / in-situ
Status
Research
Identifiers
arXiv:2101.09356 DOI:10.1007/s40042-022-00472-4
Added
2026-10-22

Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.