Hybrid physics-ML & parameterization

Will Artificial Intelligence supersede Earth System and Climate Models?

Christopher Irrgang, Niklas Boers, Maike Sonnewald, Elizabeth A. Barnes, Christopher Kadow, Joanna Staneva, Jan Saynisch-Wagner

Nature Machine Intelligence · 22 January 2021 · Colorado State University (incl. CIRA), NOAA (incl. GFDL, PSL, GSL, NCEP/EMC), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), Princeton University, University of Washington

PaperPDF

In one sentence. Perspective proposing Neural Earth System Modelling, which fuses deep networks and Earth system models into interpretable hybrids that might eventually replace them.

Abstract

We outline a perspective of an entirely new research branch in Earth and climate sciences, where deep neural networks and Earth system models are dismantled as individual methodological approaches and reassembled as learning, self-validating, and interpretable Earth system model-network hybrids. Following this path, we coin the term "Neural Earth System Modelling" (NESYM) and highlight the necessity of a transdisciplinary discussion platform, bringing together Earth and climate scientists, big data analysts, and AI experts. We examine the concurrent potential and pitfalls of Neural Earth System Modelling and discuss the open question whether artificial intelligence will not only infuse Earth system modelling, but ultimately render them obsolete.

Labels

Topic

Hybrid physics-ML & parameterization

Type

Position or perspective paper

Time scale

Climate projections / centennial

Domain

Global

Data

Other

Status

Research

Identifiers

arXiv:2101.09126 DOI:10.1038/s42256-021-00374-3 OpenAlex:W3194456427

Added

2026-10-22

Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.