ML4WX

Explainability, uncertainty & physics

Calibration and Uncertainty Quantification of Convective Parameters in an Idealized GCM

Oliver R. A. Dunbar, Tapio Schneider, Andrew M. Stuart, Alfredo Garbuno-Iñigo

Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · · California Institute of Technology (Caltech)

PaperPDF

In one sentence. Calibrate-emulate-sample with Gaussian process emulators and ensemble Kalman inversion quantifies convective parameter uncertainty in an idealized GCM at a fraction of MCMC cost.

Abstract

Abstract Parameters in climate models are usually calibrated manually, exploiting only small subsets of the available data. This precludes both optimal calibration and quantification of uncertainties. Traditional Bayesian calibration methods that allow uncertainty quantification are too expensive for climate models; they are also not robust in the presence of internal climate variability. For example, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods typically require model runs and are sensitive to internal variability noise, rendering them infeasible for climate models. Here we demonstrate an approach to model calibration and uncertainty quantification that requires only model runs and can accommodate internal climate variability. The approach consists of three stages: (a) a calibration stage uses variants of ensemble Kalman inversion to calibrate a model by minimizing mismatches between model and data statistics; (b) an emulation stage emulates the parameter‐to‐data map with Gaussian processes (GP), using the model runs in the calibration stage for training; (c) a sampling stage approximates the Bayesian posterior distributions by sampling the GP emulator with MCMC. We demonstrate the feasibility and computational efficiency of this calibrate‐emulate‐sample (CES) approach in a perfect‐model setting. Using an idealized general circulation model, we estimate parameters in a simple convection scheme from synthetic data generated with the model. The CES approach generates probability distributions of the parameters that are good approximations of the Bayesian posteriors, at a fraction of the computational cost usually required to obtain them. Sampling from this approximate posterior allows the generation of climate predictions with quantified parametric uncertainties.

Labels

Topic
Explainability, uncertainty & physics, Hybrid physics-ML & parameterization
Type
New model or method
Method
Classical ML (trees, GP, linear, kernels)
Domain
Global
Data
Other
Status
Research
Identifiers
arXiv:2012.13262 DOI:10.1029/2020ms002454 OpenAlex:W3113646778
Added
2026-10-22

Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.