ML4WX

Explainability, uncertainty & physics

Evaluation, Tuning and Interpretation of Neural Networks for Meteorological Applications

Imme Ebert-Uphoff, Kyle A. Hilburn

arXiv preprint · · Colorado State University (incl. CIRA)

PaperPDF

In one sentence. Practical guidance on evaluating, tuning and interpreting meteorological neural networks, covering effective receptive fields, relevant performance measures, and layer-wise relevance propagation for image classification and translation.

Abstract

Neural networks have opened up many new opportunities to utilize remotely sensed images in meteorology. Common applications include image classification, e.g., to determine whether an image contains a tropical cyclone, and image translation, e.g., to emulate radar imagery for satellites that only have passive channels. However, there are yet many open questions regarding the use of neural networks in meteorology, such as best practices for evaluation, tuning and interpretation. This article highlights several strategies and practical considerations for neural network development that have not yet received much attention in the meteorological community, such as the concept of effective receptive fields, underutilized meteorological performance measures, and methods for NN interpretation, such as synthetic experiments and layer-wise relevance propagation. We also consider the process of neural network interpretation as a whole, recognizing it as an iterative scientist-driven discovery process, and breaking it down into individual steps that researchers can take. Finally, while most work on neural network interpretation in meteorology has so far focused on networks for image classification tasks, we expand the focus to also include networks for image translation.

Labels

Topic
Explainability, uncertainty & physics
Type
Review, survey or tutorial
Method
CNN / U-Net
Domain
Regional
Data
Satellite
Status
Research
Identifiers
arXiv:2005.03126 OpenAlex:W3023870883
Added
2026-10-22

Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.