A Comparison of Prediction Algorithms and Nexting for Short Term Weather Forecasts

Michael Koller, Johannes Feldmaier, Klaus Diepold

arXiv preprint · 18 March 2019 · Technical University of Munich (TUM)

In one sentence. Compares neural networks, regression trees and Nexting for short-term local weather trend forecasts from historical data; no single method clearly wins, with Nexting good for slow signals.

Abstract

This report first provides a brief overview of a number of supervised learning algorithms for regression tasks. Among those are neural networks, regression trees, and the recently introduced Nexting. Nexting has been presented in the context of reinforcement learning where it was used to predict a large number of signals at different timescales. In the second half of this report, we apply the algorithms to historical weather data in order to evaluate their suitability to forecast a local weather trend. Our experiments did not identify one clearly preferable method, but rather show that choosing an appropriate algorithm depends on the available side information. For slowly varying signals and a proficient number of training samples, Nexting achieved good results in the studied cases.

Labels

Labels and summary are generated by Claude and reviewed weekly. Wrong? Edit this entry.